You have to give the Department for Education credit for sheer cheek! The latest revised guidance on flexi-schooling provides us with an absolute master class in how to appear to be giving way without in fact budging an inch. Here it is in full;
Clarification on Flexi-Schooling DfE March 22nd
On 22 February 2013, the Government published revised advice on school attendance. The advice clarified the Government's expectations on how various school attendance codes should be used to record pupil school attendance.
Schools should not mark a pupil as attending school, using the attendance code B for off-site education activity, unless the school is responsible for supervising the off-site education, and can ensure the safety and the welfare of the pupil off-site. Schools are ultimately responsible for the attainment of every child registered on their roll. Whilst being home educated, parents and carers are responsible for pupils, not schools.
Where parents have entered in to flexi-schooling arrangements, schools may continue to offer those arrangements. Pupils should be marked absent from school during periods when they are receiving home education.
The reference in the Government's revised advice on school attendance, that was categorical that a school could not agree to a flexi-schooling arrangement, has been removed.
The first thing to note is that any flexi-schooling arrangement means that the school itself must be responsible for the welfare and safety of the child while he is in his own home. Yes, that's right. If little Jimmy falls over and hurts himself in his bedroom on the day that he is being educated at home, then the school has to take responsibility for the injury! This single statement is enough to kill any flexi-schooling dead on the spot. No Head is going to agree to this. It would mean that if a child were killed in an accident at home, the Head could face criminal charges for negligence.
Still, not to worry. You will see that existing flexi-schooling arrangements may continue. The pupils will now just be marked absent on those days. Since schools are judged by their absence rates, why would they possibly want to agree to this? What advantage will there be to any school encouraging flexi-schooling?
Showing posts with label DfE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DfE. Show all posts
Monday, 25 March 2013
Thursday, 17 June 2010
Grounds for optimism and despair
Firstly, the grounds for despair. The Department for Education has decided to 'clarify' the position for home educated children being offered places at a Further Education College. As readers will know, some parents are currently having to pay for their fourteen and fifteen year old children to attend colleges which are free to any sixteen to nineteen year old and also to younger school pupils who have been sent there. This is of course horribly unfair and quite a few parents are keen to get free college places for their children. The local authority position had always been that there is no funding available for this from central government and that home educating parents assume complete financial responsibility for their children's education. This situation has now changed........or has it? You decide. This is what the DfE said yesterday;
The current financial responsibility for home educated children has not changed, namely, that parents who choose to electively home educate their children assume financial responsibility for their education. This is set out in paragraphs 5.1 – 5.2 of Elective home education: Guidelines for local authorities.
However, funding may be available where a local authority provides significant financial support for a home educated young person in two specific circumstances. These are, first, where the young person has SEN and secondly where the young person attends further education college to take GCSEs or other courses. It is for the LA to decide whether to fund the provision: they have the discretion to do so but are not required to do so.
In other words, the local authority can do it, but they don't have to. I have no idea at all if this is a real change of policy or simply describes an existing state of affairs of which most home educating parents were unaware! The bottom line seems to be that letting a home educated child into a college will involve the LA in a lot of paperwork and irritating delays while they haggle with Westminster to try and reclaim the money. I have a suspicion that few will feel that they wish to put themselves out like this. Many home educators are mad troublemakers whom the local authority will be sick of anyway. Why would they wish to do any favours to these people? Before there are howls of anger, I was actually thinking about some of my own actions even now that my daughter is at college. When my daughter asked if it would be OK for me to collect her A level results because she would be away at a summer school in Cambridge when they were released, the administrator told her it would be fine. Simone then asked if I would need to bring ID, to which the woman replied wearily, 'I think we all know your father, Simone'. Says it all, really!
The grounds for optimism are of a negative nature, ie something which will not happen. There is fury about the Ofsted report, but at a time when savage cuts are being made all over the place, not least in education, will the government really want to set up a new inspectorate funded by the taxpayer in order to track down and register a few thousand home educators? It is unlikely, particularly since these are the sort of people who will be making challenges through the courts, seeking judicial review and so on. It would end up costing a fortune and even then there would be still be many unknown families. It might just have worked if ContactPoint were operating, but as things stand I simply can't see how it could be done. Rest easy then, all of you who are 'under the radar', at least for now.
I hope that I am not a fussy pedant, but am I alone in noticing that the DfE manage the astonishing feat of getting in a split infinitive and tautology in a mere five words?
choose to electively home educate
Have you ever seen an uglier construction? obviously, somebody who is electing to do something is choosing it, so one of those word is not needed. The split infinitive also makes the phrase sound horrible. Whta would be wrong with; choose to home educate? And so with such illiterate monkeys framing their press releases, the Department for Children are hoping to advertise the advantages of the education which they can offer in maintained schools......
The current financial responsibility for home educated children has not changed, namely, that parents who choose to electively home educate their children assume financial responsibility for their education. This is set out in paragraphs 5.1 – 5.2 of Elective home education: Guidelines for local authorities.
However, funding may be available where a local authority provides significant financial support for a home educated young person in two specific circumstances. These are, first, where the young person has SEN and secondly where the young person attends further education college to take GCSEs or other courses. It is for the LA to decide whether to fund the provision: they have the discretion to do so but are not required to do so.
In other words, the local authority can do it, but they don't have to. I have no idea at all if this is a real change of policy or simply describes an existing state of affairs of which most home educating parents were unaware! The bottom line seems to be that letting a home educated child into a college will involve the LA in a lot of paperwork and irritating delays while they haggle with Westminster to try and reclaim the money. I have a suspicion that few will feel that they wish to put themselves out like this. Many home educators are mad troublemakers whom the local authority will be sick of anyway. Why would they wish to do any favours to these people? Before there are howls of anger, I was actually thinking about some of my own actions even now that my daughter is at college. When my daughter asked if it would be OK for me to collect her A level results because she would be away at a summer school in Cambridge when they were released, the administrator told her it would be fine. Simone then asked if I would need to bring ID, to which the woman replied wearily, 'I think we all know your father, Simone'. Says it all, really!
The grounds for optimism are of a negative nature, ie something which will not happen. There is fury about the Ofsted report, but at a time when savage cuts are being made all over the place, not least in education, will the government really want to set up a new inspectorate funded by the taxpayer in order to track down and register a few thousand home educators? It is unlikely, particularly since these are the sort of people who will be making challenges through the courts, seeking judicial review and so on. It would end up costing a fortune and even then there would be still be many unknown families. It might just have worked if ContactPoint were operating, but as things stand I simply can't see how it could be done. Rest easy then, all of you who are 'under the radar', at least for now.
I hope that I am not a fussy pedant, but am I alone in noticing that the DfE manage the astonishing feat of getting in a split infinitive and tautology in a mere five words?
choose to electively home educate
Have you ever seen an uglier construction? obviously, somebody who is electing to do something is choosing it, so one of those word is not needed. The split infinitive also makes the phrase sound horrible. Whta would be wrong with; choose to home educate? And so with such illiterate monkeys framing their press releases, the Department for Children are hoping to advertise the advantages of the education which they can offer in maintained schools......
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
