Saturday, 9 October 2010

Update on the proposed new guidelines

It seems that the person who has been writing the new guidelines in collaboration with Graham Stuart is in fact Alison Sauer, who provides training on the subject of home education for local authorities. I cannot help wonder who is paying for all this; if the taxpayer then there does not appear to have been much transparency! I am sure that now we know one of the people involved, everything will become a little clearer.
Posted by at
Labels: , ,

14 comments:

  1. Anonymous9 October 2010 at 16:32

    Any clues as to the source and their reliability?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Julie10 October 2010 at 00:05

    This is a hot topic on one list I have seen, which also gives the same name as above.....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Simon Webb10 October 2010 at 00:27

    Alison is a regular visitor here. It goes without saying that if she tells me that I am wrong about this, I shall grovel and apologise at once!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous10 October 2010 at 01:10

    Are you going to grovel and apologise to EO then?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Simon Webb10 October 2010 at 01:19

    'Are you going to grovel and apologise to EO then?

    Grovel and apologise for what? I pointed out that they were not opposed to compulsory registratin at the time of the select committee. I suggested that they might well be embroiled now with Graham Stuart. Alison Sauer may be drafting the actual guidelines, but she is being aided by others. Are you saying that Education Otherwise have categorically denied being involved in this? If so, then yes, I will certainly apologise!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous10 October 2010 at 01:24

    You didn't imply that they were the mysterious people working behind home educators backs on new guidance then? If this is the case you really aught to brush up your writing skills because I could have sworn that was the basis of you last article.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10 October 2010 at 01:27

    Sorry replied to the beginning before reading to the end of your last comment. Are you saying then that your source is a bit suspect, that they do not know all of the parties involved?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Simon Webb10 October 2010 at 01:30

    ' Are you saying then that your source is a bit suspect, that they do not know all of the parties involved?'

    I am saying that Alison Sauer is actually doing the writing and that other people are also involved, helping and advising. I suspect that some of these are members of Education Otherwise, but if that is not the case then in view of all the rumours circulating, it would be easy enough for EO to deny that this is so.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10 October 2010 at 01:58

    They have.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Simon Webb10 October 2010 at 03:08

    'They have. '

    Could you let us know where this has been said?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous10 October 2010 at 03:46

    You've already been asked for the source of your information and refused to give it. Why expect others to give you their sources? Suffice to say it came from EO.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Simon Webb10 October 2010 at 03:55

    ' Why expect others to give you their sources? Suffice to say it came from EO. '

    I understand you to be saying that Education Otherwise deny being involved with Graham Stuart in this enterprise, but do not wish to tell people publicly that this is the case. That's absolutley fine. As soon as they issue the public denial, my public apology will be ready and waiting!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous10 October 2010 at 04:14

    So your are prepared to accuse based on here say, but not apologise?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous10 October 2010 at 04:15

    Bah, spell checkers!

    Make that hearsay.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)